Appearance
question:Translate the parabola y=-left(x-1right)^{2} one unit to the right and two units up, we get the parabola ( )A: y=-x^{2}+2B: y=-left(x-2right)^{2}+2C: y=-x^{2}-2D: y=-left(x-2right)^{2}-2
answer:To translate the parabola y=-left(x-1right)^{2} one unit to the right and two units up, we follow these steps:1. One Unit to the Right: When we translate a function one unit to the right, we subtract one from the x variable inside the function. Therefore, translating y=-left(x-1right)^{2} one unit to the right gives us:[y = -left((x-1) - 1right)^{2}]Simplifying the expression inside the parentheses:[y = -left(x - 2right)^{2}]2. Two Units Up: To translate the function two units up, we add two to the entire function. Applying this to our current equation gives us:[y = -left(x - 2right)^{2} + 2]Thus, after translating the parabola one unit to the right and two units up, we get the equation:[y = -left(x - 2right)^{2} + 2]Therefore, the correct answer is boxed{text{B}}.
question:A factory produces three different models of products, A, B, and C. The ratio of the quantities of these three models is 3:4:7. Now, using stratified sampling, a sample of size n is drawn for inspection. If there are 9 pieces of model A products in the sample, then n= boxed{?}.
answer:Let the total number of products in the factory for models A, B, and C be 3k, 4k, and 7k respectively, where k is a common multiplier. According to the stratified sampling method, the sample should maintain the same ratio of 3:4:7.Since there are 9 pieces of model A within the sample, we can set up the proportion for model A as follows: frac{9}{n} = frac{3k}{3k + 4k + 7k} Solving for n we get: frac{9}{n} = frac{3k}{14k} 9 cdot 14k = 3k cdot n 126k = 3k cdot n n = frac{126k}{3k} n = 42 Hence, the size of the sample n is boxed{42}.
question:If x-3y=4, then the value of left(x-3yright)^{2}+2x-6y-10 is ______.
answer:Given the equation x-3y=4, we want to find the value of left(x-3yright)^{2}+2x-6y-10.First, we simplify the expression by recognizing that 2x-6y can be rewritten as 2(x-3y):begin{align*}left(x-3yright)^{2}+2x-6y-10 &= left(x-3yright)^{2}+2left(x-3yright)-10 &= left(x-3yright)^{2}+2cdot4-10 quad text{(since x-3y=4)} &= 4^{2}+2cdot4-10 &= 16+8-10 &= 24-10 &= 14.end{align*}Therefore, the value of the given expression is boxed{14}.
question:Let (a=log_{2}frac{1}{4}), (b=2.1^{frac{1}{3}}), (c=left(frac{4}{5}right)^{2}), then the relationship among (a), (b), and (c) is ( ).A: (a < b < c)B: (a < c < b)C: (b < c < a)D: (c < b < a)
answer:Solution: (a=log_{2}frac{1}{4} 1), (c=left(frac{4}{5}right)^{2} in (0,1)),Therefore, (a < c < b),Hence, the correct option is: boxed{B}.This can be determined by using the monotonicity of functions.This question tests the understanding of the monotonicity of functions, reasoning, and computational skills, and is considered a basic question.
question:(The full score of this question is 12 points) Prove: The necessary and sufficient condition for the equation ax^2+bx+c=0 to have a root of 1 is a+b+c=0.
answer:Analysis:To prove this statement, we need to demonstrate two aspects:1. If ax^2+bx+c=0 has a root of 1, then a+b+c=0.2. If a+b+c=0, then ax^2+bx+c=0 has a root of 1.Proof:1. Necessary Condition: Assume that 1 is a root of the equation ax^2+bx+c=0. Substituting x=1 into the equation, we get a(1)^2+b(1)+c=a+b+c=0. Therefore, if the equation has a root of 1, then it is necessary that a+b+c=0.2. Sufficient Condition: Assume that a+b+c=0. We need to prove that 1 is a root of the equation ax^2+bx+c=0. Substituting x=1 into the equation, we get a(1)^2+b(1)+c=a+b+c. Since a+b+c=0, substituting this into the equation gives 0=0, which is true. Therefore, if a+b+c=0, it is sufficient for the equation to have a root of 1.In conclusion, the necessary and sufficient condition for the equation ax^2+bx+c=0 to have a root of 1 is boxed{a+b+c=0}.
question:10.5 On an 8 times 8 chessboard, there are 16 rooks placed in 16 squares. How many pairs of rooks can attack each other (rooks can attack each other if they are in the same row or the same column with no other rooks between them)?
answer:Solve 16 pairs.We point out that if there are a rooks in a row, then there are a-1 pairs of rooks that can attack each other in that row. Therefore, the number of rooks that can attack each other horizontally will not be less than 8 pairs. Similarly, the number of rooks that can attack each other vertically will not be less than 8 pairs.There exists an arrangement where exactly 16 pairs of rooks can attack each other, for example, by placing all the rooks on the two main diagonals (top-left to bottom-right, top-right to bottom-left).